<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First review of Papershow &#8211; a new smart pen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crucialthought.com/2009/01/15/first-review-of-papershow-a-new-smart-pen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crucialthought.com/2009/01/15/first-review-of-papershow-a-new-smart-pen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Merrifield</title>
		<link>http://www.crucialthought.com/2009/01/15/first-review-of-papershow-a-new-smart-pen/comment-page-1/#comment-39824</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Merrifield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crucialthought.com/?p=509#comment-39824</guid>
		<description>Similar technology, but different use: Papershow reproduces what you write on a pad on your computer screen, or, more likely, a data projector, so you can use it as an &quot;electronic flipchart.&quot;  I bought one to try out for teaching purposes, with somewhat mixed results.

It works OK as a replacement for the whiteboard, with text faithfully reproduced and some basic graphic functionality to draw arrows, ellipses, etc.  However, I am not sure that the students will like it, as, unlike a rolling conventional whiteboard, text disappears suddenly when I start a new page, which can be very annoying when trying to take notes.

The big let-down is when using it to annotate Powerpoint.  My intention was to leave blank spaces in my presentation so that I could work through problems in handwriting, integrated into the presentation -- I liked this idea, because doing mathematical calculations and derivations works much better when they are hand written than when typeset, and I planned to save the annotated slides for the students to download if they wanted them.  Unfortunately, though, Papershow does not integrate properly as a plugin to Powerpoint; instead it imports your presentation into its own software then shows the slides with its own viewer.  This means that all but the most basic functionality of Powerpoint is lost, with none of the animations, embedded web applets, etc available, which means I really cannot use it in the way I had hoped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar technology, but different use: Papershow reproduces what you write on a pad on your computer screen, or, more likely, a data projector, so you can use it as an &#8220;electronic flipchart.&#8221;  I bought one to try out for teaching purposes, with somewhat mixed results.</p>
<p>It works OK as a replacement for the whiteboard, with text faithfully reproduced and some basic graphic functionality to draw arrows, ellipses, etc.  However, I am not sure that the students will like it, as, unlike a rolling conventional whiteboard, text disappears suddenly when I start a new page, which can be very annoying when trying to take notes.</p>
<p>The big let-down is when using it to annotate Powerpoint.  My intention was to leave blank spaces in my presentation so that I could work through problems in handwriting, integrated into the presentation &#8212; I liked this idea, because doing mathematical calculations and derivations works much better when they are hand written than when typeset, and I planned to save the annotated slides for the students to download if they wanted them.  Unfortunately, though, Papershow does not integrate properly as a plugin to Powerpoint; instead it imports your presentation into its own software then shows the slides with its own viewer.  This means that all but the most basic functionality of Powerpoint is lost, with none of the animations, embedded web applets, etc available, which means I really cannot use it in the way I had hoped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenJanowski</title>
		<link>http://www.crucialthought.com/2009/01/15/first-review-of-papershow-a-new-smart-pen/comment-page-1/#comment-39807</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenJanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crucialthought.com/?p=509#comment-39807</guid>
		<description>What is it supposed to do? Any potential advantages over the Pulse Pen? Does not sound like a worthy competitor at this point. 
(I love my Pulse Pen, too!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it supposed to do? Any potential advantages over the Pulse Pen? Does not sound like a worthy competitor at this point.<br />
(I love my Pulse Pen, too!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.crucialthought.com/2009/01/15/first-review-of-papershow-a-new-smart-pen/comment-page-1/#comment-39806</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crucialthought.com/?p=509#comment-39806</guid>
		<description>Sounds like another case of a cool idea that isn&#039;t followed through because the cool idea &quot;should be enough.&quot;  My own experience is from trying to use Interwrite boards after they managed to outbid their SMART and Promethean competitors.  Mini review: You don&#039;t even get what you pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like another case of a cool idea that isn&#8217;t followed through because the cool idea &#8220;should be enough.&#8221;  My own experience is from trying to use Interwrite boards after they managed to outbid their SMART and Promethean competitors.  Mini review: You don&#8217;t even get what you pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

